Kategoriarkiv: English

(Eng) Fujinon 90mm F2

For the past one and a half year I’ve used Fujifilm as my primary walkaround camera system, using it alongside my Nikon gear. With the small and handy 35mm F2, well-rendered 56mm 1.2 and flexible 16mm 1.4 taking turns mounted on my XT-2.

As I have a strong preference for telephoto the Fuji 90mm F2 has always been on my radar ever since I first got my XT-1. It’s flattering reviews all over the Internet are hard to miss.

(All photos on the article has been edited in Captured One 10.)

First impression
The first thing that struck me was how light the lens is in relation to its length. It looking much like a enlonged 56mm 1.2 it’d be easy to imagine the weight to translate similarily. But the lens is overall fairly light, especially compared to the equivalent 135mm F2 lenses for full-frame cameras, with my experience with a Samyang 135 F2.

Rendering and image quality turned me off slightly. Though mostly for two reasons; me coming in with way overblown expectations and also – against better knowledge – expect it to render and perform like a 135mm F2 on full-frame cameras. Images do turn out sharp, overall well corrected – at the expense of what some might call character-giving optical flaws.

Autofocus performance for AF-S was OK. While quite fast it’s no speed-demon. Again, I was coming in with overblown expectations from reading tons of essentially hysterical reviews praising the lens.

—-
Opinions overall

Talking sharpness is boring and something given perhaps too much focus in many other reviews, much thanks to being something you can test and quantify, so I’ll keep it brief. Modern lenses go from very sharp to super sharp, with post-processing often being used to make very sharp images turn super sharp.

This lens is sharp. Slightly sharper than the 56mm 1.2.



XT-2 – 90mm F2 @ F2 – 1/500 – ISO-250

One of the qualities of the lens I never think I heard a reviewer bring up is the solid minimum focus distance with decent magnification. It’s minimum focus distance being at least 20cm shorter than my old Samyang 135 F2 made a big difference and makes the lens much more flexible. At close to the minimum focus distance at full aperture it’s also quite easy to completely smush the background.

Out of focus backgrounds are rendered well with background highlights or ”bokeh balls” rendered quite round and smooth even close to the extreme corners. Only gaining a slight [American] football-shape in the uttermost corners. Sharpness transition is unintrusive and looks fine.

XT-2 – 90mm F2 @ F2 – 1/1000 – ISO-200

Observations The floating elements in the lens is causing a clucking sound when it’s not powered on and rocked about. Harmless, but could be a slight distraction and something that takes away from the otherwise quite solid exterior build.

Autofocus – AF-S The autofocus performance of the lens is OK. Some seem to describe it at blazing fast or instantaneous. But comparing it to real fast lenses like brand-name 70-200 2.8, 300mm 2.8 or even the Tamron 90mm 2.8 VC – it’s no speed demon, while being adequately fast in good light. In dim light the autofocus risks of being reduced to a crawl due to limitations in the current Fuji cameras.

Autofocus – AF-C/Tracking I seldom use anything except AF-S on the XT-2, but I wanted to give the tracking a shot and brought the 90mm F2 to an airsoft game. Conditions weren’t ideal with rain and moderate light. But despite that I was surprised how well the combo performed despite me being ill-experienced with AF-C/tracking use on the XT-2.

Most of the photos I shot in continuous-high were sharp enough and the photos that turned out out of focus I’d be willing to blame on my perhaps sub-optimal settings or handling. Many photos I shot in long sequences looked kind of out of focus and dull in the viewfinder, but turned it sharp when reviewing them. Odd how that works.

XT-2 – 90mm F2 @ F2 – 1/500 – ISO-640

Aperture ring
Finally Fuji got the aperture ring tightness narrowed down. Out of the Fuji lenses I’ve tried this has the best aperture ring, with solid clicks and good resistance. Much better than the borderline dreadful ring on the 56mm 1.2 or just a bit too loose ring on the 16mm 1.4 – and slightly better than the good ring on the 35mm F2.

XT-2 – 90mm F2 @ F2 – 1/500 – ISO-2000

Final words
Fuji found a good balance with this lens between performance, price and weight. The relatively tight minimum focus distance is also a great bonus. For portraits the 90mm F2 and 56mm 1.2 perform quite evenly from an image quality perspective, with different working distances and light sensitivity.

For primary Fuji shooters who has the slightest interest in medium telephotos the 90mm F2 is a given. The only real competitor would be the more expensive, bigger and less well-rendered 50-140mm 2.8.

Using this lens on the XH-1 and future sensor-stabilized cameras Fuji is releasing should make for an excellent combo further improving its versatility.

(Eng) Fabriken “Good old Rush” 2018-08-11

Borås, Sweden.

Whenever I go to Borås it seems the rain is waiting for me. Today was no exception. But the rain particles in the air can make for some more dramatic photos, so – fine by me.

aug 12 2018aug 11 2018_35

Today’s game is a variant of the ”Rush” mode video-gamers should be familiar with from the Battlefield series, a mode that was – to my knowledge – introduced in Bad Company (2008).

The players are split into two teams taking turns acting as attackers and defenders. The play field starts off quite small but as the attackers complete certain tasks they receive a spawn point further onto the field which naturally pushes the front line further onto the field. While a time limit promises some variety to avoid locked down games to drag on for too long.

aug 12 2018aug 11 2018_3

The play field is divided into two general parts; the outdoors segment and the inner factory complex. The outside is dominated by the slightly curved, streamlined concrete path with provisional cover leading up to three-four openings to the factory – along with a smaller green path up the cliff side of the path leading to the absolute edge of the field.

Second part is the factory area dominated by thick brick walls in varying degrees of health with machines, forklifts and some tarpaulins acting as cover in the dark.

During this game I spent pretty much the entire day outdoors with the camera. The lighting conditions were a bit too poor for decent indoor photos. Last game I attended I shot a few photos indoors.

aug 12 2018aug 11 2018_23_PSLB

In an attempt to spice up some of the photos a touch I added some slight letterbox black bars. The result were a bit mixed, especially since I had to use Photoshop for the job – with no real plan or template. It’s something I might try again in the future first when I have more of a recipe for how to do it right.

aug 12 2018aug 11 2018_46

The prolonged rain caused the player base to eventually whither. But the game carried out close to the announced end time thanks to a few brave players fighting it out through the whole day.

About the location

According to a short Wikipedia article (Swedish) the factory plant dates back to 1896 and was back in the day one of the first rubber factories in Sweden. In 1960 the American company Firestone bought the factory and manufactured rubber products, such as tires and hockey pucks, until 1990 where the factory was essentially abandoned.

As fairly typical for factories like this I’ve been unable to find that much resources about the more nitty-gritty details online. I did however stumble across this blog showing off some more detailed photos of the factory in 2014.

aug 12 2018aug 11 2018_28

An assortment of photos from the game in total below, with more photos on Flickr.